Luigi Reggi

Civic monitoring for urban development: Insights from the Lazio region

/0 Comments/in , /by

On March 21, 2025, I had the pleasure of representing Monithon at the final event of a civic monitoring pilot supported by the Managing Authority of the ERDF Lazio Regional Programme 2021–2027. Held at WeGil in Rome, the event brought together local administrations, associations, national and international institutions to discuss the outcomes of a participatory initiative focused on monitoring urban development projects in Latina, Frosinone, Rieti, and Viterbo, as part of Policy Objective 5 on sustainable urban development. This initiative is part of a broader effort led by the European Commission, and was selected as one of 11 pilot projects across Europe to test new forms of civic participation at the local level (see this article on Panorama).

The initiative was developed with the support of the OECD and the European Commission and was based on the Monithon method for civic monitoring. This approach, which we’ve been refining since 2013 to help citizens engage with public policies through structured and evidence-based assessments, has been validated and integrated by the OECD for the occasion.

From the very beginning of the event, the tone was set by two important institutional voices. Francesco Amodeo, representing DG REGIO of the European Commission, recalled that President Ursula von der Leyen recently sent a letter to all Commissioners stressing the need to involve citizens more directly in shaping EU policies. He emphasized how DG REGIO is putting this principle into action by supporting regional initiatives like the one in Lazio. Amodeo also mentioned the example of the Polish pilot as a demonstration of how civic engagement can become part of EU cohesion policy governance.

Giulia Cibrario, a policy analyst at the OECD, highlighted that among the 11 pilots supported by the Organisation, Lazio’s was the only one to adopt civic monitoring as its method. She also shared a word of caution: in a context where administrations are often forced to do more with less, citizen participation might be seen as an optional luxury. But it should be the opposite. Participation is both intrinsically valuable, as it strengthens trust in institutions, and instrumentally beneficial, as it contributes to more effective and informed policymaking. At the local level, she said, citizens bring not just enthusiasm but also contextual knowledge and practical experience.

From fieldwork to dialogue: the civic monitoring process

Between October 2024 and March 2025, local associations across the four cities undertook a full civic monitoring cycle, supported by Monithon and the regional institutions.

This process included:

  • Training and document analysis to understand project goals, budgets, and implementation status;
  • Field data collection, including community surveys, GIS-based spatial analysis, and field visits to project sites;
  • Public restitution events, where associations presented findings and engaged in dialogue with municipal officials and project managers (RUPs).

To name a few examples: the Borgo Piave Committee collected 441 survey responses from local residents; Quartieri Connessi engaged 123 participants in their investigation; Schioppo Bene Comune, Urban Center, Legambiente, and others conducted georeferenced analyses and field visits to verify the state of urban interventions.

The final reports were published on reports.monithon.eu, adding to a repository of over 1,400 civic monitoring reports created using Monithon’s method across Italy and other 8 European Countries.

At the final event, the associations shared their experience through live interventions and video messages. Their reflections brought to light both successes and critical challenges — including how the initiative helped open new channels of communication, and where bureaucratic inertia or lack of responsiveness remained a barrier. These testimonies reflected a strong desire to be heard, as well as a clear sense of public responsibility and expertise.

👉🏻 Read the reports from a list (in Italian)

Tangible results, recognized by institutions

The monitoring activities led to several concrete outcomes.

First, access to information improved. In many cases, project managers collaborated with associations by sharing implementation data and explaining procedures during dedicated meetings. This not only demystified the management of EU funds but also gave citizens tools to track progress independently.

Second, the initiative had a direct impact on public decision-making. In at least five documented cases, suggestions from civic monitors were taken into account by municipal authorities and forwarded to the project designers and contractors for integration.

Third, the project fostered a culture of continued civic engagement. Several associations expressed their commitment to continue following the projects they monitored, essentially “adopting” them and preparing to produce follow-up reports in the future.

The case of Latina was particularly striking: despite political turnover and a complex institutional environment, the municipality maintained its participation throughout the process, showing institutional resilience and commitment to dialogue.

The robustness of the Monithon method was acknowledged throughout the day. Its structure, transparency, and replicability allowed associations to produce insights that were specific, data-driven (when data was available), and framed in constructive terms — qualities that made them more likely to be taken seriously by institutions.

What we learned: reflections from national and local stakeholders

The third panel of the event — focused on lessons learned and future replicability — brought together insights from a wide range of institutional actors: Massimo Allulli (ANCI), Alba Garavet (Metropolitan City of Turin), Viviana Russo (Technical Secretariat of PRigA, Department for Cohesion Policy), and Fulvio Pellegrini (Capacity for Cohesion Programme).

Allulli and Russo identified several structural challenges that continue to limit citizen participation:

  • The uncertainty around the timing and availability of resources for local governments;
  • The fear that engaging with citizens might slow down the delivery of public policies and services;
  • The difficulty in managing conflict or balancing competing interests;
  • And the lack of administrative capacity to process and integrate feedback from below.

However, these obstacles are not insurmountable. As Alba Garavet put it: “We can do it.” She described a long-term collaboration between the Metropolitan City of Turin, the University of Turin, and Monithon, where students were trained in civic monitoring and engaged directly with public officials. This model, active since 2016, has fostered mutual learning and growing trust between institutions and citizens — proving that with adequate support, public participation can become a real asset to local governance.

The road ahead: from pilot to partnership

In his concluding remarks, Massimiliano Pacifico, representing the Lazio Managing Authority, presented a set of proposals to transform this initial civic monitoring experience into a structured and long-term partnership.

The proposals include:

  • A permanently open municipal call to involve stakeholders (partners of Territorial Strategies) over time;
  • A dedicated regional web platform called MONISTER, which aggregates project data, links to OpenCoesione and Monithon, and supports transparency and public access to implementation data. The platform will include short training videos to support citizens in learning about how to monitor projects during all phases and after conclusion;
  • An annual municipal meeting with local partners, modeled on the successful format of this event;
  • And additional initiatives — such as collaboration pacts, expanded communication efforts, new forms of territorial outreach, and participation in European city networks — based on the input of municipalities and associations.

My takeaway: toward a new public culture

From my perspective at Monithon, this initiative confirmed what we’ve believed for over a decade: citizens are not just observers of public policy — they can be co-assessors, co-creators, and co-responsible for its success. The Lazio pilot showed that with the right conditions — transparency, openness, and method — civic monitoring can build new relationships of trust, generate specific and actionable proposals, and help administrations become more responsive.

The determination of the participating citizens, their willingness to learn, and their readiness to continue beyond the project timeline areall signs that something meaningful was set in motion. Our method gave them a framework, but local organizations gave it life.

As we move forward, Monithon remains committed to supporting public administrations, local communities, and institutions that want to adopt civic monitoring as part of their governance strategy — not as an experiment, but as standard practice.

Luigi Reggi

Making civic monitoring matter: reflections from the “Transport for People” event in Warsaw

/0 Comments/in , /by

On March 13, 2025, I had the opportunity to participate in the “Transport for People” meeting, held at the Center for European Transport Projects headquarters in Warsaw. Organized with the support of European Commission – DG REGIO and the OECD, the event brought together policymakers, researchers, civil society organizations, and academics to explore how citizens can play a role in shaping transport infrastructure and mobility policies.

The audience was composed mainly of civil servants from transportation agencies, both national and local, as well as local government officials and mobility experts from across Poland. Other participants included representatives from civil society organizations, researchers, and practitioners working on participatory governance.

GZM’s pilot project

A key focus of the event was the GZM Citizen Forum on Transport, an inspiring pilot project that tested deliberative citizen engagement in transport planning (here is a brief summary). Developed with the technical assistance of the OECD Open Governance Unit and funded by the European Commission’s DG REGIO, the project aimed to demonstrate how citizen participation can make infrastructure investments more transparent and accountable, particularly for projects funded by the European Regional Development Fund.

The pilot introduced innovative participatory methods that we at Monithon are considering integrating into our civic monitoring methodology. Among the most inspiring elements were:

  • The combination of citizen input with expert guidance. Citizens engaged in “study walks” alongside transport and policy experts, providing on-the-ground feedback while gaining insights from professionals.
  • The use of random selection to ensure a more representative public participation process. Unlike traditional consultations that attract only the most motivated individuals, the pilot experimented with inclusive selection methods to reach a broader demographic.

At the same time, the event discussions highlighted challenges in implementing deliberative participation:

  • Sustainability of participation: Since the process was designed as a one-time engagement, citizens were not expected to continue their involvement beyond the initial forum.
  • Privacy and data access: GDPR restrictions made it difficult to obtain data on residents, a common challenge across EU countries when trying to implement random selection in participatory processes.
  • Financial incentives for participants: The pilot provided a small stipend for participants, raising questions about whether financial compensation could create bias in citizen selection. The experts leading the pilot responded that the payment was symbolic, covering three days of participation, and was not a strong enough incentive to distort the process.

I look forward to receiving updates on future steps of this action, including when government officials will process suggestions.

Issues in public participation

Beyond the technical aspects of participation, the discussion also touched on broader issues related to when and how to engage citizens in decision-making. In particular:

  • What role should citizens play? Can they provide useful expertise, or are there areas where policy decisions should rely solely on specialists? The border between these two areas remains blurred. One common answer was:
    “Start with a clear diagnosis → Choose the right method → Identify the right target group.”
  • The long timeline of major infrastructure projects. In the transport sector, national projects can take up to 15 years to complete. This raises the challenge of how to ensure that citizen input at the beginning of the process remains relevant years later.

A key takeaway from the discussion was the importance of following up with citizens after participation processes. Too often, people provide input, but never hear back about whether their suggestions were taken into account. Even more critically, it is essential to monitor whether the commitments made in participatory processes are actually implemented.

This is where civic monitoring comes into action. Citizen engagement should not stop at consultation—it should be linked to long-term accountability mechanisms. Ensuring that what was decided on paper actually gets executed is at the core of Monithon’s mission.

The challenge of implementing civic monitoring recommendations

As part of the panel discussion “Good Intentions Are Not Enough: The Hard Reality of Implementing Participatory Solutions,” I shared insights from Monithon’s experience with civic monitoring. In particular, I discussed why, even when citizens provide detailed monitoring reports, recommendations often fail to be implemented.

Monithon mainly operates with a bottom-up approach, meaning that citizens select projects, conduct monitoring, and engage policymakers directly. This model has led to several success stories, such as the Campobasso pedestrian overpass project, monitored by a team of high school students called Walking People and engaged through project At the School of OpenCoehesion. These students didn’t just evaluate the project—they organized interviews, public events, and proposed redevelopment ideas, many of which were implemented. Their engagement helped accelerate the project’s completion, and today, their student-designed logo is a permanent feature of the overpass, symbolizing their civic contribution.

However, this type of success is not always guaranteed. One of the biggest challenges we see is that local governments—who are often the target of monitoring reports—were not the ones who initiated the monitoring process. As a result, they frequently claim that they lack resources, experience, or a culture of participation to act on the findings. This creates a paradox: at the national or regional level, authorities actively promote participatory initiatives, but at the local level, where action is needed, municipalities sometimes struggle to respond effectively.

How can we make civic monitoring more effective?

Institutionalizing Local Accountability Mechanisms. One promising approach is the to create structured but flexible partnership mechanisms between municipalities and civil society. These would ensure that municipalities at least engage with monitoring reports and provide responses, even if they are not forced to adopt recommendations.

Using the Media to Amplify Civic Monitoring Results. One of the most effective ways to ensure civic monitoring has an impact is through media engagement. Monithon has a partnership with Il Sole 24 Ore, Italy’s leading economic newspaper, to publish investigations based on citizen monitoring reports. With support from DG REGIO, we have also contributed to the training of young female journalists to further develop these stories. This kind of media visibility puts pressure on institutions to respond to civic monitoring findings.

Providing More Support for Local Governments. If municipalities claim they lack resources or expertise, then regional or national institutions should provide direct support through:

  • Training programs to help municipalities work with citizen-generated data.
  • Funding incentives for local governments that actively respond to monitoring results.
  • Technical assistance to guide local administrators on how to implement recommendations effectively.

Moving from participation to impact

Civic monitoring has the potential to make public investments more transparent and effective, but only if institutions—especially at the local level—don’t just receive recommendations but actively respond to them.

At Monithon, we are committed to working with institutions to ensure that civic monitoring isn’t just an exercise in participation—but a tool for real change. The “Transport for People” event highlighted both the possibilities and limitations of participatory processes, reinforcing the need to connect public participation with long-term monitoring and accountability.

Monithon

iMonitor Project Presented at the G20 Anticorruption Working Group: Highlights from Panel Discussion

/0 Comments/in , , /by

Monithon Europe had the privilege of being represented by its president Luigi Reggi at the recent G20 Anticorruption Working Group event “Just and Sustainable Procurement for People and Planet” held in Paris, France. This gathering saw key discussions on the role of public procurement and the monitoring of public spending through open data and digital technologies. These topics are central to the G20’s agenda leading up to the summit in Brazil in November 2024, where global commitments, including the recent resolution on digitization, data, and ICTs in procurement, will be finalized.

The event featured prominent panelists such as Sally Guyer and Kristen Robinson from the Open Contracting Partnership, Giuseppe Busia, president of ANAC [here his speech and presentation], and Mr. Henrique de Oliveira Andrade, Chief of Staff of the Secretariat of Internal Control, Office of the Comptroller General, Brazil. Their collective insights underscored the significance of transparency and technological advancements in fighting corruption.

 

G20 (Brasil presidency) Anti-corruption working group meeting

 

The G20, as the primary platform for global economic cooperation, has played a crucial role in leading the global fight against corruption. G20 countries, accounting for 75% of world trade and 80% of global GDP, committed to ensure they have in place “systems of procurement based on transparency, competition and objective criteria in decision-making to prevent corruption” in 2014. They also approved G20 Principles for Promoting Integrity in Public Procurement in 2015 and a G20 Compendium of Good Practices for Promoting Integrity and Transparency in Infrastructure Development in 2019, emphasizing the need for openness and transparency of such procurement. The States parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption also committed, in 2021, to “increasing transparency and accountability in the management of public finances and in government procurement, funding and contracting services to ensure transparency in government actions in the use of public funds and during the whole public procurement cycle” to fully implement article 9 of the Convention and approved a resolution entitled Promoting transparency and integrity in public procurement in support of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development last December.

 

Monithon introduced its latest initiative, the iMonitor project coordinated by the Government Transparency Institute, as a key example of leveraging technology to combat corruption and fraud in public procurement. The project combines data-driven risk assessments with civic monitoring of public contracts, empowering local communities to evaluate the outcomes of public tenders and report actionable findings to law enforcement agencies. This approach highlights the potential of digital tools to enhance the capabilities of citizens in ensuring accountability and transparency in public spending.

Monithon, created in 2013 as an independent initiative supporting citizens in the participatory assessment of the effectiveness of EU projects, has, since 2023, offered a specific methodology and a tool for gathering input on potential misuse of public funding to anyone. The input from local communities is primarily used to foster collaboration with local authorities responsible for local investments, but it can also be forwarded, if deemed relevant, to national anticorruption authorities.

Citizens can select relevant public tenders to monitor on the OpenTender portal, which gathers open government data on millions of contracts in the EU from different official sources and calculates corruption risk indicators for each tender. In Italy, citizens can also start the selection process by identifying an EU-funded project in their town or neighborhood through the Project Finder map, where projects are georeferenced with high precision based on the address. Once they find an interesting project for their community, they can look for related public tenders through the Unique Project Code, which all Italian public administrations use.

 

 

The panel discussion indeed highlighted the importance of including civic actors in the procurement process, by “giving stakeholders clear channels to turn insights from open data on public procurement into policy changes, better resource allocation, stronger contract negotiation and smarter more efficient delivery of goods, services and infrastructure”. For this to happen, citizens should be able to access sufficient training on technical matters.  The discussion also focused on the crucial availability of high-quality and interoperable data, such as those connecting investment projects, public tenders, business registers, company ownership, and beneficial ownership. The AI application ALICE presented by the Brazilian government seems a very promising tool when based on the right data.

We extend our gratitude to the delegates of the G20 countries for their engaging questions and to the French government team for their excellent organization of the event. The outcomes of this session will be shared with the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) to support the implementation of CoSP resolution 10/9.

For more information about the iMonitor project, visit the iMonitor website.

Monithon

Let’s learn how to monitor the EU funding for the environment!

/0 Comments/in , , /by

We are happy to invite you to two free online training events (in Italian) on the civic monitoring of EU funding for the environment in Italy on April 16 and May 21. On the second day, we will launch a national civic monitoring network. Here you can find the program and all the info to participate.

If you are interested in participating or collaborating with us, please send us an email at retemonitoraggiocivico@gmail.com!

Two online events, free and open to all, are scheduled for next Friday 16 April and Friday 21 May, from 2.00 pm to 5.00 pm, organized in collaboration with the Sbilanciamoci! Campaign, with the laboratory “European cohesion policies and territorial communication strategies” (Prof. Alba Garavet), and the course “Communicating Europe: institutions, representations and public opinion” of the University of Turin (Prof. Marinella Belluati). What are the environmental projects financed in Italy by the European Union through the resources of the European Cohesion Policy? Where exactly are they located, and what kind of interventions do they envisage? How much are the resources allocated to them, and who manages them in our country? How to monitor their progress and evaluate the real impact on beneficiaries and territories? These are the questions to be answered in the two initiatives in April and May, thanks to the participation of experts, activists from Italian environmental organizations and networks, students, institutional representatives.

This training is co-funded by the Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy of the European Commission thanks to the project “A national network for civic monitoring of European funds for the environment and sustainable development”, created by the NGOs Lunaria and Monithon. The project is supported by the Sbilanciamoci! Campaign, the OpenCoesione initiative of the Department for Cohesion of the Presidency of the Council and the Department of Culture, Politics and Society of the University of Turin, the Metropolitan City of Turin, and the Europe Direct Turin.

Download the complete program of the two events on April 16th and May 21st (in Italian)

In particular, the afternoon of Friday 16 April will open with a session aimed at providing – thanks to the interventions of Anguel Beremliysky (Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy of the European Commission) and Francesca De Lucia (expert in environmental issues) – an overview on the EU Cohesion Policy and European funds for the environment in Italy. Following, the best practices of civic monitoring animated by Monithon, by the laboratory on European cohesion policies of the University of Turin and by the University of Turin will be presented with contributions respectively by Luigi Reggi (Monithon), Alba Garavet (Europe Direct Torino), Simona De Luca, and Gianmarco Guazzo from At School of OpenCohesion (ASOC). 

Besides, the Monithon team will offer specific training on the civic monitoring of EU funds for the environment and sustainability, which finance thousands of projects throughout Italy. On this occasion, a new interactive platform will also be illustrated – created in collaboration with Sheldon Studio starting from the open data published by OpenCoesione – to discover and promptly locate the projects financed in one’s territory, and access all the information already available such as the financial dimension, the description, the subjects involved, the implementation schedules and the progress. The objective of the event on April 16 is to launch initial experimentation of environmental civic monitoring by “triggering” the autonomous initiative of the training participants.

The event scheduled for the afternoon of Friday 21 May will open with the presentation of civic monitoring initiatives – their challenges, strengths, and the preliminary results achieved – launched on an experimental basis following the training day of 16 April. The discussants for this session will be Willebrordus Sluijters and Andrea Mancini of the Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy of the European Commission. During the second session, the foundations will then be laid for the process of setting up a national civic monitoring network of European funds for the environment and sustainable development, with a round table of comparison and extended discussion between various organized subjects of Italian civil society. Among the organizations and participants who confirmed their presence at the round table are: Sergio Andreis (Kyoto Club), Gianluca Catullo (WWF Italy), Sabina De Luca (Forum Inequalities Diversity), Anna Donati (Alliance for Sweet Mobility), Paola Dottor (Transparency International Italia), Emanuele Genovese (Fridays for Future Italia), Anna Lisa Mandorino (Cittadinanzattiva), Maria Maranò (Legambiente), Luigi Reggi (Monithon), Sara Vegni (ActionAid), Duccio Zola (Lunaria).

Monithon

Monithon shortlisted for the ODI Open Data Award

/0 Comments/in /by

We’re happy to announce that Monithon was included in the short list of possibile winners of the Open Data Institute Open Data Award!
The ceremony will take place on the evening of the 4 November in London during the ODI Summit, a 2-days conference with talks and training opportunities.

The panel of international judges includes Beth Noveck, director at The Governance Lab @ New York University and Rahma Mian, ICFJ Knight International Journalism Fellow, Pakistan.

The Open Data Institute was founded in 2012 by Professor Nigel Shadbolt, chairman of the Institute, and Tim Berners-Lee, recognized as the inventor of the World Wide Web.
Now the Institute is at the center of a global network of “nodes” aiming at “catalysing the evolution of open data culture to create economic, environmental, and social value”. The Italian node of the ODI is based at the Fondazione Bruno Kessler – Digital Commons Lab in Trento.

In this spreadsheet you can find all the nominees in the award 5 categories: Business, Innovation, Social Impact, Publisher and Individual Champion.  Monithon is included in the Social Impact category, and is in great company! The UNHCR, MySociety, the Social Investment and Finance Team at the UK Cabinet Office and Internews Kenia have all been shortlisted in our category.
We are also very happy to see other initiatives from Italy like Enel (Open Data Business Award), OpenPolis / Depp (Innovation), and Regesta.exe (Publisher).

Fingers crossed! 🙂

Sardinia Open Data

The NeverEnding Story of the Bike Lanes in Cagliari

/0 Comments/in /by

During International Open Data Day on February 22, The Sardinia Open Data association joined the 2014 Monitoring Marathon promoted by monithon.eu and launched a local initiative – a civic walk – to pay a visit to the Su Siccu bike and pedestrian lane in Cagliari that received funding from the European Union.

The aim of this citizen monitoring was to understand the reason why eleven years of work were necessary to build a six hundred and twenty metres cycling/pedestrian path. We did so through on-line and off-line tools as we reported in our citizen monitoring report here on monithon.eu (in Italian).
The connected mapping party we organized – a little walk with GPS and notebooks to take note of thing of interest and localize them on OpenStreetMap – gave us the chance to check in detail every additional service and equipment installed along the path to improve the use of the public area.

pista_susiccu

Su Siccu (from Sardinian language, the dry area along the sea) is a portion of the city cost line, between the dock Molo Ichnusa and the Bonaria shore. Walking along the path you can admire a stunning perspective of the Cagliari’s gulf on one side and the shrine of Bonaria with its majestic staircase on the other side. Behind the path there are small kiosks, called “I ricciai”, where people can buy fresh sea urchins, local bread and white wine.

Until a few years ago this area used to be in poor condition. Now its redevelopment is part of a special program of urban development financed by European Regional Policy, called “Programma integrato per lo sviluppo urbano e la mobilità ciclabile, pedonale e pendolare nell’Area metropolitana di Cagliari” (“Integrated program for urban development and mobility in the Cagliari area”).

The story begins in the 2003 when the city was governed by the mayor Delogu. That year an agreement was signed to demolish a wall that divided the Ichnusa dock and the Garau dock, which was part of a military area managed by the Navy. The wall was dismantled in 2005 and the decision was that it would be used for public benefit. The building of the new path actually started in 2006.
The pavement was refurbished and new service areas were designed to adapt the place to its new function. A wooden sidewalk was built along the “Ammiragliato” building.

Once the first and second part of the path were almost ready, the project stopped. The whole area enclosed couldn’t be accessed until 2012. In that year the construction restarted but unfortunately many damages occurred since the place had been abandoned for six year.

On October 8th 2013 the path was ready, and could be inaugurated. On January 8th 2014 also the wooden walk path was open. After eleven years, the project cycle lane along the sea finally ended and Cagliari inhabitants now can use and enjoy the public area.

Su siccu path is only one piece of a larger project that includes a suggestive itinerary starting from the city centre, continuing along the sea and then leads to the regional park of Molentargius-Saline, a famous wet area, to reach finally the Poetto beach, where another cycling lane is going to be build shortly.

Su Siccu path is not only important from a naturalistic and touristic point of view, but is also crucial for the effectiveness of local mobility. In fact, it is part of a wider project of alternative paths and connections that everyone hope to have available as soon as possible.
Cagliari is rapidly becoming a metropolitan center with an increasing amount of people commuting from the surrounding areas. A more efficient public transport is a frequent demand from citizens that institutions have to handle every day.

During our monitoring we met a lot locals complaining about the delays of the works and the lack of information from the city government.  In their opinion, public money is not used efficiently and it does not make real benefit to the citizens. Sardinia Open Data could hear and witnesses the voice of cyclists, who recognized the that project is now completed and enjoyed the results.  However, they still could not realise why it took such a long time to build this lane and think that the overall investment was too large compared to actual results.

Kevin Legge, a local citizen from Cagliari Città Ciclabile association, pointed out in a short interview that he wishes that the city government will pay more attention to cyclists, pedestrians and drivers. At the same time, he recognizes that cyclists, pedestrians and drivers often disagree on what should be the best mobility solution.

In conclusion, urban redevelopment and local mobility are key component of the future development of the city of Cagliari. This is even more pressing since Cagliari is now candidate to become one of the European Capitals of Culture 2019 and is waiting for the final verdict. Civic awareness is more than needed to build the future in a way that ensure a real participatory process that involves all citizens in key local policy decisions.

Luigi Reggi

Monithon at the United Nations – 4th place at the #OpenGovAwards!

/0 Comments/in /by

The partnership between OpenCoesione (government initiative) and Monithon (civil society) represented Italy at the Open Government Partnership High-Level Event held on September 24th in the United Nations Building in New York.  The partnership was nominated through a public consultation that took place at the end of May 2014. The result is incredible – a fantastic 4th position and a brilliant “Silver Award”, based on the votes of an international panel of experts.

It was a great honor to represent Italy (and Italian civil society in particular) with my friends Carlo Amati, Simona De Luca e Aline Pennisi from the OpenCoesione team – and being recognized in front of Barack Obama, Francois Hollande and 9 other heads of state, official delegations from 65 countries and hundreds of civil society representatives. Unfortunately, the Italian political representatives were missing.  It is also good to receive better scores than other OGP founding Countries with longer traditions of openness and transparency than Italy such as the United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands.

Photograph by Evan Abramson for OGP

In the video from the official streaming of the United Nations, you can watch the awarding ceremony. The full video also includes the brief speeches by the representatives of the 3 top teams Denmark, Montenegro and the Philippines.

 

What the judges say about Italy. The international panel based its scores on the applications from the different Countries and considered 4 different criteria: Credibility of Partnerships, Depth of Engagement, Evidence of Results and Sustainability.

If we analyze the scores as published on the OGP website (here the CSV of the data that I scraped), we discover that Italy is in the #1 position for 2 criteria out of 4!

Great expectations.  I really hope that Italy will actually invest on such a crucial topic for democracy, institutions and the economy.  We would like to win an award that considers not only the best practices but also the average value of the initiatives in a Country.

Everybody knows that awards are not really important in themselves, but I think they can help inspire more ambitious objectives for the future. I would like to thank all the OpenCoesione team as we share the same exciting adventure – and in particular Damien Lanfrey and Chiara Ciociola for their fundamental help in drafting the application for this award.
I speak on behalf of the Monithon initiative when I say Thank You and Congrats to all the people who are so enthusiastically being involved in the citizen monitoring of public policy!

2014-09-24 17.14.19

 

Photo credit – OGP/Evan Abramson. 

Chiara Ciociola

Open Action! Good news from the Open Knowledge Festival 2014

/0 Comments/in /by

Open Minds to Open Action. We are back from Berlin and learned a lot of good stuff that we are ready to report.as been an intense stream of events and a collective and interactive exploration. Debates, round tables and experimental workshops covered a huge set of topics.  This quote is from the festival’s about page: “Organised by Open Knowledge and owned, in the broadest sense, by the open community, the Festival will bring together over 1,000 people from more than 60 countries to share their skills and experiences; encouraging them to work together to build the very tools and partnerships that will further the power of openness as a positive force for chaWe had the impression of being immersed in a world where “open” is a given rather than an adjective, a pre-condition rather than a goal. This was the leitmotif of every story told, and every person we met.bag_okfest14

What did we learn? What can we do with open data and Monithon community?

We had the chance to take part in many stimulating sessions and meet interesting people. Many of these have inspired new actions and solutions for our citizen monitoring marathons.
A breathtakingly fast-paced session dealt withd Italy’s improvements withentioned not only ourity anexperiment – which scraped data for 10,000 previously Mafia-owned buildings to enable effective reuse of these assetOpen Budgets”) and e main Italian information system for tracking goverment expenditures.  The Italian context is evolving slowly, with a significant Norths, such the development of the Italian Government’s  More info on this session can be in the notes fro

Not just official sessions. One of the most inspiring encounters we had was the one won initiative based on monitoring the quality of government services such as licence permits. Info on citizens’ rights and government obligations is displayed in plain English on the Bantay portal. However, its purpose is not simply to complain – “Don’t hate, participate!” is its motto. Targeting  high school students, its goal is to collect structured feedback on administrative procedures. “We are firm believers in the feedback loop. Rating on Facebook and Twitter will only get you so far. If we use proper channels for feedback, we have a chance of actually turning these complaints into cases which can later on lead to reform”.  Using the data collected, they compute a “Red Tape Index” for each agency, which includes ratings of compliance, transparency, facilities, process flow etc., with the ultimate goal of identifying malpractice and demanding change. In Italy e light on the public health system”).

Strengthening Monithon method. This great example gave us the opportunity to re-think our method of citizen monitoring.  The session o an additional, nos are used and, in particular, which companies benefited from that funding to supply goods and services. The project Open Contracting has developed a set of guiding principles that include “Participation, Monitoring, and Oversight”.  Even more concretely, this project is developing a global standard in order to publish procurement data which has already yielded some results. In Slovakia, for instance, data were published by the government as early as 2011. The same happened in Nepal and Georgia, where official governmental data (published in PDF format…) were re-published and visualized, with the aim of making them easier to understand and facilitating engagement on the part of the citizenry. In Georgia, thanks to open data on public contracts, it was possible to identify potential cases of corruption or false competition (6% of the total). These are the “golden rules” of the Slovak working group, which was among the first communities to take action: 1. Get the data, 2. Make it as available as possible, 3. Understand the data, 4. Involve people, 5. Take action, 6. Be able to cooperate. The main critical issues of this process are the willingness of governments to provide comprehensive data (e.g. about subcontracting) and, once the data is open, citizen engagement. According to Eva Vozarova of Fair Play Alliance, “Disclosure is just the beginning.”
What about Italy? Tracking financial flows is possible through the CIG, unic code of tender by National Anti-Corruption Authority (ANAC) for tracking financial flows. Its portal has published the database of public procurement, with the chance of searching and downloading open data.

opencontracting

Don’t be naive. With these words Beatriz Busaniche (core team member of Creative Commons Argentina and founding member of Wikimedia Argentina) closed her keynote. She stressed the need to improve public participation so that they can truly challenge the existing decision-making mechanisms.

This is precisely what we want to do with the Monithon project, as these are our next steps:

  1. Developing Monithon method, by making our toolkit better-equipped and more accessible for use by individual citizens and civil society.
  2. Experiment with what the World Bank calls “closing the loop”, i.e. that theoretical cycle that starts with the availability of open data on funds, moves through the collection of feedback from users, and ends with concrete action being taken by the government based on the feedback received.
  3. Encourage the involvement of a larger number of national and local communities, through the use of the “train the trainers” method. The Monithon core staff wants to act as a catalyst for local independent actions, which will allow our project to finally scale up.
Monithon

Monithon and OpenCoesione will represent Italy at the OGP Awards!

/0 Comments/in /by
Public voting nominates Monithon and OpenCoesione to represent Italy at the OGP Awards!
The public consultation that took place at the end of May has officially made its choice: with an 82% share of the votes, the OpenCoesione-Monithon partnership (which includes also A Scuola di OpenCoesione) will be Italy’s candidate at the OGP Awards.
We will have to wait July to know the winners, but we consider this result already an important landmark for Monithon. As a citizen journalism and civic media platform, the positive feedback received from the civil society during this public consultation is already a moral win.
If a 82% of votes in our favor wasn’t gratifying in itself, we were immensely pleased by the many positive comments that accompanied the votes – some of which you can read at the end of this post.
A big thanks to all of you: knowing we have your support and appreciation will enrich our work with renewed enthusiasm, as we continue to open our project to volunteers willing to contribute to this success.
We’ll be waiting for you on monithon.eu and on our mailing list!
Comments from the public consultation:
“An example worth studying: OpenCoesion is an empowering government initiative; Monithon is an example of what citizens can do thanks to a wise open data policy.”
“What I appreciate about Monithon is its spirit of openness and sharing, which is put in practice during its activities. It is easy to follow and promptly able to attract new people in the loop. I hope it will win and expand its coverage to other funds.”
“The project covers the whole of Italy through a national network, while also being admired and studied internationally. It is a link between technical and civic education, allowing people to make a concrete use of open data.”
“The initiative tangibly fosters civic engagement and an active involvement of citizens, even without requiring specific expertise. The project gave many citizens the opportunity to tell stories, report bad practices, and also publicize good practices.”
“One of the best contributions to the study of open government and methods for civic participation – on an international scale.”
“One of the most important examples of civic monitoring and grassroots participation.”
“Monithon’s platform is extremely user-friendly and usable. Once it will interact with OpenCoesione more directly, it will become a best practice model for every Public Administration.”
“Excellent idea to involve young people with the daily problems of their city. All the candidates are great projects, but I am tied to Monithon because of a deep fondness towards its representative members, because of their passion and because of the originality of the approach.”
“Civic monitoring is the first step on the road of active and reactive citizenship: to become citizens who are able to observe, evaluate, control and communicate in regards of the works and intervention carried out with public funds.”
Monithon

A new monithon at the International Journalism Festival in Perugia

/0 Comments/in /by

A new “monithon” is coming at the International Journalism Festival 2014. Meet us at the 2nd #ijf14 hackathon to unleash the power of open data and citizen journalism, and come investigate how the city of Perugia spends its public funds.

During the event, a curious crew of monithoners will mash, remix and play with the information from OpenCoesione – the national open data portal on EU and national policies for development and cohesion. Our idea is to start from a selection of ICT projects funded by EU Structural Funds and reveal whether there are inconsistencies behind the projects for public wi-fi hotspots in Perugia.

According to the official data from OpenCoesione, the project should have been completed by December 2013. Yet, the city has so far used only 60% of the total funding available. During the Festival everyone will be busy tweeting, writing emails and sharing on the web the latest conference highlights: all thanks to our 3G signal. But what’s the money flow behind Perugia’s public wi-fi hotspots?

This starting question intertwines with many other issue that can find an answer through the OpenCoesione portal. We could expand on Perugia’s other 3500 EU funded projects, or explore national ICT projects aimed at the improvement of technology diffusion in schools, or at the development of a broadband network… The options are endless; the projects on OpenCoesione are 749,112; the financed amount reaches 74.9 billion euros and the money flows in the hands of 73,898 subject.  Some examples:

 We have the big data, now we need the big brains: if you want to join the forces with our crew of citizen monithoners, meet us at the Hotel La Rosetta, from 9 am to 6pm. 

The programme of the day.  In the morning we will do background research to decide on which are OpenCoesione’s most interesting projects to monitor. Then, after lunch, we plan to physically walk around the city to visit these projects, do interviews, collect data and shoot photos and videos. At the end of the day we will organize all the evidence in a “citizen monitoring report” and upload it on monithon.eu. Saturday morning, all the participants of the monithon event will report the main findings in a dedicated panel.

For info and updates:

 

Photo by Stefano Parmesan